AMFS NL Logo
 
Pseudotumor Cerebri
Counselor,

Pseudotumor Cerebri, otherwise known as, Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disorder of unknown etiology. It affects predominantly obese women of childbearing age. The primary problem is chronically elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and the most important neurological manifestation is papilledema, which may lead to progressive optic atrophy and blindness. Although it is not a common disorder, clinicians must be familiar with its presentation so that it can be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. Delay in treatment will result in a catastrophic outcome.

We value all your comments, so, if you have a suggestion for a newsletter subject but haven't submitted it yet, or if you have already submitted one but think of another, please take a minute to let us know by clicking on your "Reply" button and dropping us a note.

To learn more about AMFS, Inc., the organization run by Physicians and Attorneys that provides medical experts and case review services nationwide, and has produced the following informational newsletter to aid you in understanding complex medical issues, please click here - www.amfs.com.

 

Pathophysiology:

Current theories regarding pathogenesis include increased resistance to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow at the arachnoid granulations that line the dural venous sinuses and through which CSF reabsorption is thought to occur by bulk flow. Alternatively, occult cerebral venous outflow abnormalities may produce IIH.
 
 

Mortality/Morbidity:

IIH is associated with no known specific mortality risk. The only permanent morbidity in IIH is vision loss from decompensation of papilledema with progressive optic atrophy. The frequency and degree to which visual loss occurs in this disease is difficult to establish from the existing literature.
 

History:

Symptoms of elevated ICP include headache that is nonspecific and varies in type, location, and frequency, pulsatile tinnitus - a rhythmic sound, heard in one or both ears, with pulsing synchronous rhythm that may be exacerbated by the supine or bending position, and horizontal diplopia - A symptom of a false-localizing sixth cranial nerve palsy.

Symptoms of papilledema include transient visual obscurations (e.g.: dimming or blackout of vision in one or both eyes lasting for a few seconds) which may be predominantly or uniformly orthostatic (i.e.: after bending over), progressive loss of peripheral vision in one or both of the eyes, most often starting in the nasal inferior quadrant, followed by loss of central visual field (possibly affecting visual acuity) and, lastly, loss of color vision, and blurring and distortion (i.e.: metamorphopsia) of central vision caused by macular wrinkling and subretinal fluid spreading from the swollen optic disc. Sudden visual loss is due to intraocular hemorrhage secondary to peripapillary subretinal neovascularization related to chronic papilledema.

 

Physical:

Visual function testing, in particular, visual field, funduscopy, and ocular motility examination, are the most important parts of the neurologic examination for diagnosing and monitoring patients with IIH. Clinicians must check for papilledema which causes blurring of the disc margins on fundoscopic exam. Also, peripapillary flame hemorrhages, venous engorgement, and hard exudates are features consistent with acute papilledema. Visual field examination will reveal the first sign of incipient postpapilledema optic atrophy which is constriction of the inferior nasal quadrant of the visual field.

Visual acuity is usually normal until significant peripheral visual field loss with progressive postpapilledema optic atrophy has occurred. Occasionally limited abduction of one or both of the eyes results from increased ICP. This loss of ocular mobility is termed false-localizing sixth cranial nerve palsy.

 

Lab Studies:

Blood tests are necessary to rule out systemic lupus erythematosus or other collagen-vascular disease, since these have been reported as underlying conditions in some patients who present with IIH.

An increased incidence of anti-cardiolipin antibodies has been reported in patients with IIH. This test should always be obtained in working up patients suspected of having IIH.

Other blood tests recommended include a CBC, Sed rate, Iron testing, ANA, anti-dsDNA, coagulation panel, and Lyme disease screening tests.

 

Imaging Studies:

Brain MRI with gadolinium enhancement is probably the study of choice for all patients with IIH since it provides sensitive screening for hydrocephalus, intracerebral masses, meningeal infiltrative or inflammatory disease, and dural venous sinus thrombosis.

MR venography can be reserved for patients who are at greater risk for dural venous sinus thrombosis, such as those with suggestion of thrombosis on MRI, nonobese or male individuals, or those with a documented procoagulant state. Sagittal T1- weighted images often provide excellent views of the superior sagittal sinus, and these typically are included in routine MRI.

Brain CT scan is less expensive than MRI and is adequate to rule out larger tumors or lesions, but it is not as sensitive as MRI for meningeal infiltration and/or dural venous sinus thrombosis.

 

Procedures:

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis is essential to the diagnosis of IIH. Lumbar puncture ideally is carried out with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Because finding landmarks is difficult in obese patients, the tap frequently is performed with the patient seated. The normal CSF pressure at the foramen magnum in the seated position is nearly 500 mm H2O from the lumbar entry point in persons of average height. Therefore, an opening pressure of 500 mm H2O is extremely high in the lateral decubitus position, but is normal for the sitting position. If possible, the patient should be moved to lateral decubitus position before measuring the pressure.

Cerebrospinal fluid studies should include opening pressure, WBC counts with differential, RBC counts, protein and protein electrophoresis, glucose, cultures, serologic markers, tumor markers, and cytology. Most patients with typical history, gender, and body habitus need only routine CSF tests. However, extra fluid should be frozen in case the preliminary workup reveals unexpected abnormalities, such as pleocytosis or elevated gamma globulin, indicating that more complete investigation for autoimmune, infectious, or neoplastic conditions is warranted.

 

Medical Care:

Patients without visual loss most often are treated with a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (e.g.: acetazolamide) to lower the ICP. Some authors believe digoxin has the same effect and is associated with fewer adverse effects. In patients with severe symptoms, early visual field loss, or poor response to standard medical therapy, some clinicians utilize a short course of high-dose corticosteroids (e.g.: prednisone).

When new visual field loss is documented, medical management should be coupled with plans for emergency surgical intervention if the visual function continues to deteriorate or does not improve immediately with corticosteroid treatment.

Diet is an important adjunct to treatment. A weight-reduction diet coupled with an exercise program is strongly advised to all patients with IIH as evidence demonstrates that weight loss is associated with improvement of papilledema in these patients.

 

Surgical Care:

For patients with IIH who have progressive visual field loss, currently two general surgical approaches can be considered: CSF shunting procedures or optic nerve sheath fenestration. The recommended shunting procedures are lumboperitoneal, ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatrial shunts. There are various pros and cons regarding which technique to use, but a discussion of this is beyond the scope of this review.
 

Prognosis:

Depending on the referral population and the rigor with which visual function is tested, the prognosis for visual loss in IIH has varied considerably in different series. Authors writing in the 1960s and 1970s indicated that fewer than 25% of these patients had functionally significant blindness; however, more recently that figure has been revised upward. In a unique major prospective study of visual function in IIH, Wall and George found that 96% of the 50 patients in a series had some degree of visual field loss on Goldmann-type perimetry, while 92% had abnormal findings on automated perimetry; 50% had abnormal contrast sensitivity and 22% abnormal Snellen visual acuity. During follow-up (2-39 mo, average 12.4 mo), visual fields improved in 60% of patients and deteriorated in 10%.
 

Medical/Legal Concerns:

Visual loss in one or both eyes can evolve rapidly despite the best efforts to arrest the process. Litigation centers on the delay of maximum medical and surgical management beyond what has to be considered ideal and standard practice in the United States for patients who present with rapidly declining vision.

The exact time window within which vision loss can be reversed after symptomatic decline is not known. Opinions among experts in the field vary as to how rapidly and aggressively any given patient should have been treated. Usually erring on the side of rapid intervention (hours to days) in such patients is better. This is a dramatic opportunity to save vision that can be easily lost. A major medicolegal pitfall is created when poor outcome is coupled with the perception of delayed treatment.

One of the standard teachings has been that pregnancy exacerbates or triggers the onset of symptomatic IIH. However, at present little statistical evidence exists of a causal association between the two conditions, beyond the fact that both events are common in the age group and gender that is predominantly affected by the disease.

 
 

Since 1990 and through 100,000+ nationwide cases, AMFS, Inc. (American Medical Forensic Specialists) has been providing plaintiff and defense attorneys in-house case evaluations as well as access to a carefully screened, nationwide panel of more than 7,500 board-certified medical experts practicing in all specialties and regions of the country.

With just a single phone call, you reach an in-house staff physician who will assist you in clarifying the medical issues present in your case, identifying the medical specialties involved and interviewing prospective experts from our panel for your case.

Whether you need a physician to review your case, testify as an expert, perform an IME, or perform any other task in the medical-legal field, in any region of the country, AMFS can help. As always, our mission is to provide counsel with the most efficient way to retain quality experts in a timely, cost effective manner.

Call Today to Speak with an AMFS Staff Physician at NO Charge. Or use this handy form to submit a case for a Quick Review.

Thank you for your time,


Attorney & Physician Advisory Board
AMFS, Inc.

CALL TOLL FREE: 1-800-275-8903